Whether youâve willingly packed into the crowded tents of Kitchener-Waterlooâs Oktoberfest, enjoyed a local beer fest or visited any of Ontarioâs many open-air music festivals, chances are youâve been greeted by an earthy, skunky scent or two as it wafted by.
Cannabis has become just as much a feature of Ontarioâs many annual, outdoor public events as alcohol is. But last fallâs legalization of recreational cannabis has charged organizers with yet another cumbersome administrative task: the obligation to integrate cannabis into their eventâs execution.
As Dave MacNeil, CEO of Festivals and Events Ontario, explains, there are still considerably more questions than answers.
DM: We donât oversee any of it; weâre not a governing body. We provide education and marketing tools, and advocate on the festivalsâ behalfâwith BIAs (business improvement areas), municipalities and with the Ontario government. Weâre sort of the voice of the industry.
DM: Itâs genuinely hard to say exactly how many events will be impacted, but Ontario hosts about 2,500 festivals each year. Regulations differ by how certain municipalities and venues choose to handle it, so itâs really case-by-case. I canât see it being allowed at more family-friendly events. Also, venue operators could decide, based on their insurance policies, that they donât want to allow it. At events with smoking zones, they will have to be checking for the age of majority.
But right now, there are a lot more questions than answers with respect to [best practices] for integrating cannabis into events. Itâs something that comes up at our conferences: Thereâs a lot of risk involved. Youâre not able to monetize any cannabis sold on site, and any infractions could really complicate your liquor licence. Thereâs no reward for taking that on right now.
Even Ottawa Bluesfest is talking about having a fenced-off area [for consumption], in addition to some educational material. But they have to be careful theyâre not in contravention of Section 16 of the Cannabis Act, which covers education.
DM: Per the law, weâre not allowed to use any marketing dollars from cannabis companies. If you think back to the days of Big Tobacco, they dumped a lot of money into promotion into the arena of arts and culture events. With smoking, because there is a long-standing legal [precedent], there are established precautions in place, and you have a way of monitoring service. Even at music festivals, there used to be a lot of cannabis products, growers, sellers, but none once it became legalized. Say you had a major festival and you wanted to have a cannabis lounge, thereâs no monetary return on that. But what if you charge for entry to the lounge? Is that legal? Right now, thereâs no clear answer on that.
So itâs like starting over. I think this will be a telling year for how we move forward.
DM: Thereâs no right way to do that with cannabis, yet. At a recent conference we hosted, the Chief of Police for Waterloo region explained that the forces are developing more and more tools to tell the difference between alcohol and cannabis impairment, but itâs still early in the game. From a risk management perspective, we have Smart Serve counselling festival workers that impaired is impaired, period. It will be a bigger issue once edibles come into law. Still, we donât want to âwhat if?â every issue to death.
DM: Itâs really easy to gloss over whatâs legal and whatâs not. At this point, thereâs not much we can do to discern the difference. Weâre suggesting that any of our members seek legal counsel. Itâs the responsibility of the organizer to vet its vendors. If you think something is off, you should probably stay away from it.
Â
Want to keep up to date on whatâs happening in the world of cannabis?  Subscribe to the Cannabis Post newsletter for weekly insights into the industry, what insiders will be talking about and content from across the Postmedia Network.