Neuropsychopharmacologist David Nutt lost his job as the UKâs chief drug advisor when he publicly criticized the governmentâs drug policies. Now, as the Edmond J Safra professor of neuropsychopharmacology at Imperial College London, heâs publishing articles in prominent journals to encourage physicians to âembrace cannabis like penicillin.â
Nutt says that doctors embraced penicillin without first running a full suite of trials because it met a major clinical need at the time. The same is true for patients suffering from severe epilepsy and other debilitating conditions, Nutt says, and therefore the response to medical cannabis should be no different from how the healthcare profession embraced penicillin 70 years ago.
The UKâs restrictive drug laws have been in the spotlight more than a few times in recent years. A number of high-profile instances of young patients being denied access to medical cannabis products, including non-psychoactive CBD generated such public outcry that UK lawmakers had to move the needleâslightlyâon medical cannabis policy. Despite the loosening of the UKâs restrictive policy, however, doctors have still been reticent to actually prescribe cannabis to patients, especially minors.
As a result, Nutt said, the rollout of the UKâs medical cannabis program âhas been much slower than patients and parents had hoped.â
Nutt said the medical community is still riven with fears and concerns about the adverse public health implications of prescribing cannabis. Nutt mentioned fears about cannabis-induced psychosis, âignoranceâ about medical cannabisâ value and the challenges of obtaining products as major obstacles.
But while Nutt is calling for more research to investigate those concerns, he still feels doctors should embrace medical cannabis treatments.
Teachers know that a startling analogy can sometimes be the best way to drive home a point, and Professor Nutt is no stranger to controversial comparisons. In 2009, Nutt was fired from his post as the UKâs Chief Drug Advisor after he compared taking ecstasy to riding a horse.
In an editorial published in Journal of Psychopharmacology, titled âEquasyâAn overlooked addiction with implications for the current debate on drug harms,â Nutt made the Swiftian argument that horse-riding presented a much greater harm to the public than illegal club drugs. Comparing rates of serious adverse events between the two activitiesâ1/350 for horse riding, 1/10,000 for ecstasy/MDMAâNutt made the statistical case that an addiction to horse riding was way worse than taking ecstasy.
Nutt said the point of the editorial was to draw attention to the way society measures the harm of drugs versus the harm of accepted and legal activities. But then-Home Secretary Jacqui Smith didnât appreciate the rhetorical move. Smith sharply criticized Nutt and fired him from his post over the editorial.
Now, Nutt is at it again. In an article for the medical journal BMJ, the professor compared the British medical communityâs historical embrace of penicillin to its need to embrace cannabis today.
âAbout 70 years ago another natural medicine came into the medical arena,â Nutt said of penicillin. âThis was welcomed enthusiastically by UK doctors even though there had been no placebo-controlled trials of its efficacy, because it was seen to fulfill a major clinical need.â
Nutt feels patients with severe and debilitating conditions in the UK present an equally urgent clinical need. And he wants doctors to respond by prescribing more cannabis.
The post Former Chief Drug Advisor Urges UK Officials to âEmbrace Cannabis Like Penicillinâ appeared first on High Times.