CLASS ACTION UPDATE for INVVY, NOK, EQBK and PYX: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Investors of Class Actions on Behalf of Shareholders

NEW YORK, June 18, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that class action lawsuits have commenced on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies. Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiff have until the deadlines listed to petition the court and further details about the cases can be found at the links provided. There is no cost or obligation to you.

Indivior PLC (INVVY)
Class Period: March 10, 2015 - April 9, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: June 24, 2019
Join the action: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/indivior-plc-loss-form?wire=3 

About the lawsuit: During the class period, Indivior PLC allegedly made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Indivior and its executives engaged in an illicit nationwide scheme to increase prescriptions of Suboxone Film; (2) Indivior illegally obtained billions of dollars in revenue from Suboxone Film prescriptions by deceiving health care providers and health care benefit programs; (3) as a result of the aforementioned misconduct, Indivior would face felony charges; and (4) due to the foregoing, Defendants’ statements about its business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

To learn more about the Indivior PLC class action contact [email protected].

Nokia Corporation (NOK)
Class Period: April 15, 2015 - March 21, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: June 18, 2019
Join the action: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/nokia-corporation-loss-form?wire=3 

About the lawsuit: Throughout the class period, Nokia Corporation allegedly made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Alcatel-Lucent S.A. ("Alcatel") maintained insufficient internal controls and was materially non-compliant in its business practices; (ii) Nokia had failed to conduct adequate due diligence into Alcatel prior to its acquisition; (iii) subsequent to the completion of Nokia’s acquisition of Alcatel, the Company maintained insufficient internal controls over the integration of Alcatel’s businesses; (iv) as a result of the foregoing, at all relevant times, Nokia was at risk of serious criminal and civil penalties; and (v) as a result, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

To learn more about the Nokia Corporation class action contact [email protected].

Equity Bancshares, Inc. (EQBK)
Class Period: May 11, 2018 - April 22, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: July 12, 2019
Join the action: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/equity-bancshares-inc-loss-form?wire=3 

About the lawsuit: During the class period, Equity Bancshares, Inc. allegedly made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company lacked adequate internal controls to assess credit risk; (2) as a result, certain of the Company’s loans posed an increased risk of loss; (3) as a result, the Company was reasonably likely to incur significant losses for certain substandard loans; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

To learn more about the Equity Bancshares, Inc. class action contact [email protected].

Pyxus International, Inc.  (PYX)
Class Period: on behalf of stockholders who purchased Pyxus (f/k/a Alliance One International, Inc. (AOI)) securities between June 7, 2018 and November 8, 2018, inclusive.
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 6, 2019
Join the action: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/pyxus-international-inc-f-k-a-alliance-one-international-inc-loss-form?wire=3 

About the lawsuit: Pyxus International, Inc.  allegedly made materially false and/or misleading statements during the class period and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company was experiencing longer shipping cycles; (2) as a result, the Company’s financial results would be materially affected; (3) the Company lacked adequate internal control over financial reporting; (4) the Company’s accounting policies were reasonably likely to lead to regulatory scrutiny; and (5)  as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.