Investors sometimes complain about quarterly earnings. The argument is that the short-term focus on three-month periods forces publicly traded companies to lose their long-term focus. Decision-making is impaired as companies try to beat Wall Street estimates for each quarter instead of taking the long view. This can turn once-solid companies into stocks to sell over time.
In this market, the âshort-termismâ argument falls a bit flat. The likes of Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN) have been rewarded by investors for investing in the near term to increase long-term profits.
Still, itâs true that investors can overreact to a single quarter. A modest earnings beat or a few million dollars in extra sale donât always change the long-term investment case. At the same time, sometimes a quarter matters. Sometimes, performance over three months can change the story for years to come.
InvestorPlace - Stock Market News, Stock Advice & Trading Tips
For these seven companies, recent earnings reports mattered â and thatâs not good news. These arenât necessarily the seven stocks that fell the most after earnings. But among mid-caps and large-caps, theyâre the seven whose stories took the biggest hit and theyâre the seven stocks to sell now. Each of these stocks fell sharply during earnings season, and each of these stocks may have a difficult time bouncing back any time soon.
Online postage provider Stamps.com (NASDAQ:STMP) hasnât just seen its story change after earnings. Its story has broken.
For some time, short sellers had argued that STMP was due for a precipitous fall once its exclusive contract with the United States Postal Service was inevitably altered. Theyâve been proven absolutely right. STMP lost its contract in February, news which sent the stock down by more than 50%.
Three months later, in its first quarter report, Stamps.com slashed full-year EPS guidance from $5.15 to $6.15 to $3.35 to $4.85. STMP dropped another 56%, far and away the worst post-earnings decline of any widely held stock. The stock has continued to fall since. Itâs now down 86% over the last year, and has lost 78% of its value in 2019 alone. According to data cited by Bloomberg, STMP is the first stock since at least 2001 to fall 50% after earnings following two consecutive quarters.
STMP stock does look cheap, at a little over 10x the low end of 2019 EPS guidance. But with the business model in upheaval, profits plunging, and investor confidence shattered, it should be cheap. And it will likely stay that way for some time until it can right the ship.
Source: Shutterstock
3M (NYSE:MMM) is not the kind of company that makes this list very often, if ever. The diversified industrial manufacturer generally has been a stable grower. Itâs a Dow Jones component. Economic cycles have their say, but the century-old company has made its way through plenty of booms and busts.
But the companyâs Q1 report does put 3M on this list â and near the top. MMM stock fell some 13% after missing estimates and cutting its full-year outlook. The decline was so steep it took nearly 200 points off the Dow Jones Index. The response wasnât based just on the fundamentals, either.
3Mâs CEO admitted that âweâre behind the curveâ in responding to lower volumes. An aggressive layoff plan suggests that management â looking forward â might not see demand returning. Meanwhile, weakness was concentrated in two key markets â automotive and China â which may not be on the way back soon. (In the case of automotive, there are long-running worries that demand may have peaked for good.)
On this site, both Will Healy and Josh Enomoto have recommended that investors buy the dip. Both authors make intriguing cases. But MMM has kept falling after the earnings report: itâs now down about 25% from pre-earnings levels. Analysts, including Stephen Tusa, who was dead on in forecasting the long fall of General Electric (NYSE:GE), remain bearish. Trade war impacts could add further pressure. To me, itâs a stock to sell, not buy.
This isnât a case of investors reacting to a single quarter. Theyâre reacting to what the quarter means. And what it means is that 3M has fallen behind and has roadblocks in its path toward catching up.
Source: Shutterstock
Retailer Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) only fell about 9% after disappointing Q1 earnings this week. In terms of the one-day decline, JWN is hardly one of the worst performers after earnings.
But the Q1 report is more problematic for JWN than the marketâs single-day response might suggest. First, JWN shares had steadily drifted downward heading into the report. In fact, save for a very brief dip in 2016, the stock already was at an eight-year low. Expectations were modest heading into the report â and Nordstrom still couldnât deliver.
The second, broader, issue is that Nordstrom now looks like a business headed for a decline. Mall stocks in general have had a rough go of it lately, but even by those standards, JWN has underperformed. And once the narrative around a stock turns to whether earnings are done for good, it becomes a stock to sell. Weâve seen that with retailers like Bed Bath & Beyond (NASDAQ:BBBY), Tuesday Morning (NASDAQ:TUES) and Pier 1 Imports (NYSE:PIR).
Investors might retort that Nordstrom isnât part of that group â but thatâs the point. The bull case for JWN â and the reason it cleared $65 as recently as early November â was that its brand kept it immune from some of the challenges facing physical retailers. Whatâs clear at the moment is that investors no longer believe that to be the case. Once that narrative takes hold, in the days of Amazon, itâs very difficult for retailers to convince investors otherwise.
Source: Mike Mozart via Flickr (modified)
To be clear, all is not lost for Loweâs Companies (NYSE:LOW), even after a disappointing first quarter report. A 12% post-earnings decline certainly wasnât welcomed by shareholders. But LOW stock still is positive YTD. Same-store sales still rose 3.5% year-over-year in Q1. The midpoint of fiscal 2019 (ending January 2020) EPS guidance implies adjusted EPS should rise about 9% this year.
But the first quarter report is a big hit to the narrative behind LOW. As James Brumley pointed out in early March, LOW had outperformed Home Depot (NYSE:HD) stock over the past year â a notable reversal from LOWâs historic second-place status. A new CEO, new strategies, and a rationalized footprint seemed set to make Loweâs a more viable competitor to its larger rival.
Loweâs did take some share from Home Depot in the quarter: its 3.5% comp outpaced HDâs 3% print. But a huge compression in gross margin suggests that Loweâs bought some of those extra revenues. And a substantial earnings miss suggests Loweâs paid too much in the process.
Again, LOW isnât headed to the list of retailers facing bankruptcy risk. But the rally in LOW stock over the past year-plus was based on the idea that it had room for improvement, and the ability to narrow the gap with Home Depot. Q1 numbers and FY19 guidance both undercut that narrative â which is why Loweâs stock has fallen so hard.
Source: Shutterstock